It's human nature to want to feel accepted, understood, and validated by the people around us. We want to know that we're doing a good job, making good choices, and being seen in a positive light.
But here's the truth: approval from outside of yourself is impossible to truly receive. Why? Because every person experiences the world through the lens of their own beliefs, experiences, values, and perceptions.
Let's look at an example.
I have a daughter with unique needs, so the special-needs community holds a special place in my heart. I believe that people with special needs deserve the same opportunities, respect, experiences, and access to life as anyone else. Because I hold that belief, I naturally feel connected to people who share it.
On the other hand, when I see someone treating a person with special needs in a way that I perceive as disrespectful or unfair, I may immediately feel anger toward that person. I might decide that one person is "good" and another is "bad."
But what am I really judging?
I'm judging their behavior through my own belief system. I don't actually know who that person is at their core. I don't know their history, experiences, fears, motivations, or the beliefs that led them to behave the way they did. I am simply interpreting what I see through my own lens. In other words, what I believe about them tells me more about me than it does about them.
Here's another example.
Imagine someone who is incredibly compassionate toward people with special needs but keeps their dog leashed to a tree in the backyard. The dog has food, water, and shelter, but isn't treated as part of the family and receives little attention or companionship.
I might look at that situation and think, How can this person be so compassionate toward a human being with special needs while allowing their dog to live this way? I may admire this person for one of their beliefs while judging them harshly for another. But there are not two separate people, it's one person. It's just that the way I interpret their behavior to their dog conflicts with a belief I have while the interpretation of their behavior towards the special needs person aligns with a different belief I have.
This happens constantly. We have countless beliefs about how people should behave, how families should function, how children should be raised, how animals should be treated, what makes someone successful, what makes someone kind, what makes someone responsible, and what makes someone "good." And we're constantly comparing the people around us to those beliefs.
When someone aligns with our beliefs, we tend to feel comfortable with them. When they don't, we may feel uncomfortable, frustrated, threatened, or even angry. That doesn't necessarily mean we can't get along with someone who thinks differently. It simply means that their behavior may activate something within us because it conflicts with what we believe to be true.
Which brings me back to the original idea: Approval from sources outside of yourself is impossible to attain because every time you are viewed by someone, it's always through the lens of their own beliefs. It has NOTHING to do with you.
Let's imagine you're a new teacher, and your principal and assistant principal are observing you for your yearly evaluation. You know the observation is coming, so you prepare carefully. You plan your lesson around everything you believe your evaluators will be looking for. The day arrives, and you teach your lesson while both administrators watch and take notes. You feel confident. You believe you did a good job, and you're looking forward to seeing how you were rated.
Then you sit down for your post-observation meeting. One evaluator praises your performance and rates you as meeting the standard in most categories, even exceeding the standard in one. The other evaluator agrees that you met the standard in some areas but rates you below standard in others. You're confused. How can two people observe the exact same lesson, use the exact same rubric, and come away with different evaluations?
Because they're human.
Each evaluator is interpreting what they saw through their own individual belief system, experiences, expectations, and perceptions. Their brains are processing the same information differently. Perhaps one evaluator sees something in you that reminds them of themselves in a positive way. Perhaps the other sees something that reminds them of an experience they had in a negative way. Maybe one values a particular teaching style while the other values something completely different.
The lesson itself was neutral. You taught the lesson. They interpreted it. A well-designed rubric can create consistency and provide objective criteria, but it can never completely eliminate human interpretation. Two people can look at the same behavior and assign two different meanings to it.
And here's where it gets really interesting: The teacher still gets to decide what the evaluation means.
She could interpret the "below standard" comments as a personal attack. She could decide that she's a terrible teacher, that her administrators don't like her, or that she's not good enough. Or she could look at the same evaluation and think, There are areas where I can improve.
The evaluation itself is simply information, the meaning she assigns to that information determines her emotional response.
This doesn't mean we should ignore feedback or pretend that other people's opinions don't matter. In the real world, they sometimes matter very much. If your job requires you to meet certain standards, dismissing your supervisor's evaluation as "just their opinion" could have serious consequences. The point isn't to disregard other people's perceptions. The point is to see them for what they are and recognize what they are not.
They are perceptions.
They are interpretations.
They are opinions filtered through another person's experiences and beliefs.
When someone tells you that you did a great job, it feels good. When someone tells you that you didn't, it can hurt. That's human nature. We naturally seek validation from the people around us. But when you receive praise, remember what it is: one person's perception of you based on their individual lens. And when you receive criticism, remember the same thing.
Neither one defines you.
Everyone you encounter is walking through life with their own lens. They are interpreting your words, your actions, your choices, and your personality through a belief system that belongs to them. That's why the same person can be deeply admired by one person and disliked by another.
The person didn't change in that moment. The lens did.
You cannot control how someone else perceives you because you cannot control the beliefs through which they perceive the world. That's why seeking approval from others is ultimately a losing game. If you build your sense of worth around how other people see you, you'll constantly be at the mercy of their changing perceptions.
Instead, learn to give yourself the approval you're looking for. Know who you are. Know what you value. Know what you're working toward. Be willing to listen to feedback without allowing it to define you. Take what is useful, leave what isn't, and keep growing. Because at the end of the day, other people's perceptions of you are about them, not you.
You are responsible for your actions, your choices, and the person you are becoming. You are not responsible for the lens through which someone else chooses to see you.
The only person who truly knows you is you. Learning to give yourself what you need is critical because the approval you're looking for from everyone else will always be filtered through their world. The approval you give yourself comes from yours!





